Stephen Gately's family is said to be "very disappointed" by a
Daily Mail column on the subject of their son's death that has provoked
a surge of complaints to the press watchdog.Writer Jan Moir's opinion piece was dedicated to the untimely demise of the gay singer, in circumstances she described as being "more than a little sleazy".
It led to over 1,000 reports to the
Press Complaints Commission, causing their website to crash, and has been widely condemned on social networking sites.
Meanwhile, major firms rushed to tie connections with the piece,
with a Marks and Spencer spokesperson saying: "We have asked the Daily
Mail to move our advertisement away from the article. This is a matter
for The Daily Mail."
In her piece on Gately's death, Moir wrote:
"The sugar coating on
this fatality is so saccharine-thick that it obscures whatever bitter
truth lies
beneath."...I think if we are going to be honest, we would have to admit that
the circumstances surrounding his death are more than a little sleazy."Moir's column, which goes on to discuss the "happy-ever-after myth of
civil marriages" has provoked accusations of homophobia and forced the
journalist to issue a statement.
Reporting from Dublin, Sky's Enda Brady said Gately's family were not planning to read the column.
"I know his family are aware of the article, they have not read it,
they will not read it, but they know what is contained in it and they
know the sentiment," he said.
"They are just very, very disappointed."
Meanwhile, the editor of the UK's best-selling gay magazine
Attitude, said Moir's decision to link Gately's death with that of Matt
Lucas' former civil partner seemed to be an "excuse to stick the boot
in the gay population."
"If that's not homophobic, what is homophobia?" he told Sky News.
In a statement, Moir rubbished suggestions of homophobia and blamed the backlash on a plot by social networkers.
"...The point of my column-which, I wonder how many of the people
complaining have fully read - was to suggest that, in my honest
opinion, his death raises many unanswered questions," she said.
"In what is clearly a heavily orchestrated internet campaign I think
it is mischievous in the extreme to suggest that my article has
homophobic and bigoted undertones."